The Supreme Court uphold the Bombay High Court’s ruling on the intellectual property loss compensation under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and its 1995 Rules.
Petitioners approached the Bombay High Court seeking a just assessment of compensation payable for damaging property under Section 15A (11)(d) of the Atrocities Act read with Rule 12(1) of the 1995 Rules.
The Bombay High Court ruled that the term "property" should be interpreted broadly to include intellectual property such as data, electronic material, and intellectual rights, whether tangible or intangible.
Patents, copyrights, and designs, are property, even though they lack physical existence, and are capable of being valued for compensation under the SC/ST Act, 1989.
Notably, Section 8 establishes a reverse burden of proof, shifting the onus onto the accused to prove their innocence.