The Madras High Court refused to stay the operation of a single judge’s June 26 verdict.
The June 26 verdict said caste would have no role to play in the appointment of Archakas (temple priests).
Also, any person properly trained to perform pujas and other rituals as per the Agama Sastra could be appointed to the post.
These directions contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Seshammal’s case (1972).
Karana Agama, as well as the other 27 Saiva Agamas clearly prescribe that only persons belonging to the denomination of Adi Saivars/Sivachariyars/Gurukkals are eligible to become Archakas in temples governed by the 28 Saiva Agamas.
This custom was upheld by the Supreme Court in Seshammal’s case.
Other cases related to this issue
Srimad Perarulala Ethiraja Ramanuja Jeeyar Swami versus State of Tamil Nadu (1972).
Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala Sangam versus Government of Tamil Nadu (2016).